The euphoria after he won the election was amazing and everybody, even the opposition, seemed to bow down and respect Obama’s victory. He opposes war. He’s the first black president. God, THIS is the guy to bring change if ever there was any.

But what is this change I wonder? He always talks about this change he’ll bring but never went into specifics about it. I’ll return to this point later.

Anyways, I was supporting Obama too until something made me realise that other things were going on that people simply do not see or think about. I was at college about a month ago and my Media teacher showed me some clips from Obama’s 30minute election slot placed on whatever American channels it was on the eve of the election …

… there was some startling similarities between his techniques and those used in Triumph of the Will, the propaganda film put together to get ppl to support Hitler. Now this got me thinking……could Obama really be the next Hitler? Could this change he talks about (but never specifies) actually be bad?

Now some might think I’m crazy. But in Nazi Germany, all of the people were manipulated into thinking Hitler was a saviour (when really he was quite the opposite) so why can’t the people of America be fooled too?

“Because people know better nowadays!” some of you cry. Oh sure we do. The powers that be never lie to us or dupe us for their own needs do they. We never start wars for no reason do we…….*cough* Iraq *cough* weapons of mass destruction *cough* ………see what I mean? Plus, manipulation techniques have probably developed a bit since the 1930s i’d imagine.

So yeah. What if Obama will change once he is in power? Its that word again isnt it …CHANGE. What is this bloody change he plans to bring? Fixing the economy? Ah yes, of course, some people actually say he only stood a chance in the election because of the economy’s mess. People hold him up as some kind of hero who will bring us out of this recession, possibly depression soon.

Hitler was like that wasn’t he. He came along during the Great Depression and promised he would fix everything. Only he didn’t. Right, enough comparison to Hitler now, but it did make me uneasy at the similarities. And I just thought … I hope to God we arent being duped.

And then yesterday, I went on to David Icke’s website. And his latest update was an article about Obama accompanied by a huge picture of him with FRAUD stamped on him. Icke said exactly what I had been thinking: about the comparison to Hitler and the stuff to do with change.

Now it’s weird, because in the past I have ever only heard Icke’s theories and either had the choice to believe them or not – usually without evidence. But you have a different take on what he says if you notice things before he points them out to you. Perhaps he does speak sense after all, but you still need to be wary about his motives (check out my past articles to see what I mean).

Icke says that people see Obama’s change as the change they want to see in the world, and believe that Obama is going to provide this. This is why Obama hasn’t specified the change. The rich want more money. The homeless want homes. Human rights activists want more human rights. War protestors want peace. All of these people believe that their wishes will become true just because Obama says there will be change. If only he could tell us what it is.

Anyways, just keep a close eye on Obama during his time in office. I am sure we will soon see his true colours and whatever agenda he has planned to unleash upon the world. And if he turns out to be as nice as pie, I henceforth apologise for my suspicions. I don’t think things will be so rosy though, so just take heed and caution.

They both say that global warming isn’t caused by our man-made activities and is instead determined by the amount of solar activity occuring on the sun. Naturally, this makes a lot of sense. If there is more solar activity on the sun, then the Earth is bound to warm up. So a correlation between global temperatures and solar activities seems a sensible theory.

And you must think about how the natural carbon emissions, such as from volcanoes and cattle letting off wind, is much higher than our man-made emissions. This very fact shows that even if carbon emissions do contribute to global warming that we aren’t the main contributors, it’s the natural world.

As you can imagine, David Icke uses ‘The Carbon Con’ idea as more ammunition to support his theory that the government covers everything up. It works very well too, I must say. Especially his mention of the ‘medieval warm period’ in which global temperatures soared. He rightly remarked “What caused that? Turbo-charged horsewagons?”. And he is right here… what carbon emissions would we have had in the medieval days? Then he goes on to mention how global temperatures actually dropped during the post-war economic boom when quite frankly, they should have increased if they really were effected by carbon emissions, which took a drastic rise at the time.

David Icke and the documentary practically say the same thing. There’s every possibility that one source inspired the other. Or that another source inspired them. It’s like how Icke talks about how different policies get passed all over the world at similar times because the same people are controlling the governments. What if these two sources where told to present the identical theory by the same people – the Illuminati or Jesuits. It’s generally the Illuminati that does all of the work, and take the blame for it too, because I think that Icke is told to blame everything on them to hide the fact that the Jesuits are in control, which is why he stays alive – for not revealing the Jesuits. People writing about the Jesuits have had a habit of dying…

Back to global warming anyhow. Ofcom and many of the world’s scientists actually opposed the documentary and said that it had fabricated graphs and the like. This is either because the information was absolutely ludicrous or because Ofcom and these senior scientists are in on the whole scam and don’t want the truth getting out. I would think the latter, based on the link between solar activity and global temperatures, and the huge amount of natural carbon emissions. However, I must report that many British newspapers reported that some of the graphs used to support the theory were doctored, thus making it a theory based on an unjustifiable source like the 2012 theories are based on the end of the Mayan Calendar.

Perhaps they were keeping the truth hidden, who knows. Perhaps Icke and the documentary aren’t working with the Illuminati/Jesuits at all, and this is why the Illuminati-controlled media is trying to crush them for their alternative theories. All’s I can say on the matter is that nobody needs a graph to realise that the sun probably is behind global warming … makes sense after all, doesn’t it. And yes, maybe carbon emissions does trap some heat in the atmospere but it doesn’t have too much of an effect. Natural emissions have more of an effect. So I definitely think we are being told a pack of lies and that the carbon con does exist.

A lot of his information does seem to be logical and everything ties together unlike the real world that hides the world Icke exposes in his books. Through apparent research, he has predicted things that will happen. Such as “there will be an attack on a major US City between 2000 and 2002″. And “a hurricane will sweep the New Orleans”. And now the US have began to invade countries in the middle-east that Icke said the US would be after.

The information may be correct (or at least taken out of context to be correct) but what are his intentions. Is he working for himself, the people, or for the very force he is exposing?

It would make sense if he was working for himself and the money and I believe he would spend time constructing a theory if he thought it would make him rich. This would make him an awful man for cashing in on our fear and definitely not one to be trusted. I don’t think this quite explains how he would get his hands on such information though. Yes, he may have been to forty countries to conduct research, as he constantly reminds people in his talks, but that still doesn’t explain how he pieced everything together. In fact, he constant mention of his visits to all those countries is like he is trying to convince us that he did actually go to all these places and like he knows that this isn’t the full story so this is his way of reassuring us.

We could definitely trust him if he was out to help the people. But is he? Oh, I doubt it to be honest. Nobody goes through the shit he has to help the very people who are ridiculing him. There must have been another incentive. Only a madman would do that and most do say he’s mad. However, I don’t think he’s mad … there’s alot of cunning in that man, you can see it in his eyes. He knows exactly what he’s doing and he has no fear. Why is that?

There could be the possibility that he is working for the secret power in the world that controls governments and the world elite. This would be very dangerous since these are the people that he is against and exposes in his books. We obviously couldn’t trust him in this case. And it would explain where he gets all of his information and what he is motivated by – money generated from our fear and money/rewards from his bosses. The secret group behind things like to control everything and I wouldn’t put it past them controlling people who are apparently against them. If this was the case, they could choose what is exposed and what stays hidden, or even if further cover stories are made up. I believe that his allegiance is with these people because, as I explained in a previous article, surely the ruthless powers would have killed him now for all of the secrets he has revealed about them. They are above the law and they would have killed him if he wasn’t an asset. End of.

To find out what type of person he really is, we must go back in time like Harry Potter and Professor Dumbledore did to find out things about Voldemort. It was in the nineties when he was a ‘normal’ person, wasn’t it. Then all of a sudden, to the opinion of most, he lost it. Just like that. Now that doesn’t happen overnight like it did with him. He must have knew what he was doing. Perhaps he was targetted as a potentially brilliant conspiracy theorist by the secret societies and they got him on board. Perhaps they got him on board before after he started. But I reckon it was before, so that the secret societies could have control of him from the very beginning.

His appearance on the Terry Wogan show really kicked things off didn’t it. Announcing that he was ‘the son of God’. People were bound to think he was mad. He has explained since that he meant ‘everybody is a divine descendant of the Gods’. Then why didn’t he bloody say this to start with? What it sounds like to me is that he was developing his theories and at first there was loopholes everywhere. The difference between his first and second appearances on the Terry Wogan show are amazing. It suggests then, that he has made up his theories and over time he has developed them so that he can convince more people it is all true. Like the apparent bad guys in all of this, he is bound to make a slip-up at some point, so keep an eye on him.

A lot of his material still seems to be convincing. I’m not sure about the reptilians but the stuff about money and space and time seem accurate. And the whole thing about globalisation could be completely wrong. In another article, I will write about how globalisation could be a good thing rather than a bad thing as Icke says it is.

To conclude, he is not a very trustworthy man although his material mysteriously makes a lot of sense. Why is that? Is it some sort of trickery? Theories forged together to line his own pockets? Lining his own pockets by writing books to expose things that he is paid to expose by the people he is exposing as ‘enemies’? Who knows.

He says that we should question everything in the world. Well I say that he needs to be questionned too, because certain things don’t add up. I smell a rat.

For the exact reason that almost every other theorist has a different theory about it, I believe that we don’t need to worry. I think it may be the case of everybody jumping on the bandwagon. And this angers me so much. If you want to promote a conspiracy and potentially scare people, then at least have the decency to be telling the truth. Below I’ll list the conspiracies that i’ve heard about and let you make your own mind up.

Firstly, there’s this Mayan Calendar isn’t there? Made by the Mayan Tribe thousands of years ago. Their whole society revolved around this calendar and time (they probably had a better system for measuring time than we do) and with this calendar, by studying the stars and things, they predicted events that would happen in the future. Fair enough, that could have happened, but we can’t prove that it did or it didn’t. The alarming part that scares people, however, is that the calendar suddenly ends on December 21st 2012, after some massive 25,000 year countdown or something. So this is where people jump in and say the world is gonna end etc etc. Many theorists use the Mayan Calendar for justification of their own theories about what will happen in 2012 and this annoys me because you can’t base a theory on the end of some calendar! The 25,000 year countdown may end in 2012 but you want me to suggest why the Mayans didn’t have a new countdown planned? Because they thought they’d still be here to make the new calendar and what would be the point in making the new calendar if the old one hadn’t finished. God, it’s like me buying a 2009 calendar when I’ll still be using my 2008 one for four months. Do you get my point?

So from the Mayan theory alone and my suggestion as to why the Calendar ends and a new countdown doesn’t start, you can see that all of the theories justified by the Mayan Calendar are bound to be tosh. The Mayan Calendar, however, was deeply prophetic and predicts many things. For example, the 25,000 year countdown ends with planet Earth, the sun and the moon being aligned in the center of the galaxy – this sprouts off more theories. The undeniable thing about the Mayans is that they had some skill about them to see thousands of years into the future, although they way people are misinterpreting things now is ridiculous.

All of this activity with being in the center of the galaxy and stuff, is going to cause a pole reversal, some theorists say. I don’t know how this would work but it is obviously something to do with magnetic fields. Could the north pole really become the south pole and vice versa? I’m guessing no if it has anything to do with 2012. Nevertheless, I think anybody can see that such a pole reversal would have diabolical effects on the Earth and due to mass destruction/death, it probably would be the end of the world for most. Whether this happens or not is a different story. I’ve seen so many things about 2012 that I don’t know what to believe and all of the theories can’t be true. I think it’s definitely the ‘bandwagon syndrome’.

Oh and then there’s NIBIRU!! Otherwise known as ‘planet X’ or the tenth planet. Apparently, this is gonna arrive 2012 and crash into our planet some say. Others say this will cause the pole reversal. Others say the fallen angels/annunaki live there. I’m sorry but … oh my god, when there are so many different theories, how can it be true? In 1930, Pluto was discovered wasn’t it. It’s TINY. Really small. It could be mistaken for a moon. Then why …… hasn’t Niburu been discovered yet if it’s like the size of Saturn? With our brilliant modern technology a tenth planet occupying this solar system would have been found!! “Oh, but the government are covering it up from us all,” I hear some fools respond. No, how could they cover up a gigantic planet from all of the astronomers in the world? How could they make sure that every single person, whether professional or casual, with a telescope, would not see Niburu?

There’s brilliantly observational theories in the world and then there’s this fear-mongering trash. It really winds me up that people can lie about such things. One video on Youtube said that Niburu will come into sight in 2012 but at the moment it’s only visible to people in Antartica! How convenient! Too bad only the penguins and Captain Scott can prove it! And on another video, I was presented slide after slide of Nibiru photos. Red circles, could have been anything really. And other photos were taken of ‘Niburu’ next to the sun. I LAUGHED. You know what ‘Niburu’ was? That little reflection of light coming off the sun in photos and footage, you know when there are like one or two mini suns reflecting off the lense? Utter bollocks it is. And they are taking some people for fools.

The spiritualists also have a view. In 2012, Earth is going to move into a higher realm of consciousness. HORRAAAAY!….. Tell me folks, what ISN’T gonna happen in 2012 eh? Apparently we are all going to get the choice to stay on the planet (falling to pieces at the time) or go up to the higher realm. God, where’s the choice haha? And the biblical guys say that there is actually no choice and that we are chosen based on our behaviour. Basically, they are saying that 2012 is a sort of judgement day.

Lovers of David Icke should not fear because he mentions no ‘end of the world’ in 2012. And that’s interesting. If he really is a controlled conspiracy theorist, like I talk about in another article, then he knows what is in store for the world and the end definitely isn’t in sight. I don’t think we can trust this man’s allegiance though he does speak some sense about things and I believe that having no conspiracies about 2012 is one of them. Then again, if this guy is controlled by the very people he is exposing, then maybe they want him to remain ignorant of 2012 and keep us in the dark. Who knows?

All’s I know is that because there are so many theories surrounding 2012, based on the end of the Mayan calendar (which in my opinion isn’t a justifiable reason), it just seems like everybody is claiming to have the answers when really they are just frauds. Heed the words of David Icke, but do not trust the man – I believe his lack of 2012 conspiracy means nothing will happen considering he has been right about everything else so far. Be wary about 21st December 2012, but do not live in fear. If it’s our time to go then it’s our time to go, there’s not much we can do about it. Spend christmas at home just incase guys, but I assure you, there’s probably nothing to fret about!

I have always wondered things about space. Assuming it is physical and therefore measurable, I thought to myself, “How is it possible for the universe to suddenly stop?” and if that seems impossible then “How is it possible for the universe to go on forever?”. Either of these suggestions must be the case, I thought, however both seemed impossible.

Due to this independant thinking, I was not at all surprised to discover David Icke’s theory of space and time being illusions. I know I must remain sceptical of this man but the idea of space being an illusion makes perfect sense to me and explains why the universe doesn’t stop yet doesn’t go on forever either.

Space is like it is in a video game – virtual reality in other words. U know the virtual reality games where you wear a visor of some sort? It looks like you can see into the distance of this virtual world doesn’t it? However, that isn’t the case. It is merely just a screen making it look like your own vision. Perhaps this is what the real world is like and perhaps we are looking through our own ‘visors’ at the world and thinking that this space exists when in reality it is like the screen on the video game.

But you can touch things, smell things, hear things, can’t you? Yes, you can indeed but this may very well be our very own matrix. Electronic responses are sent to our brain when we touch things and the like, so what if all this stuff isn’t really here? What if the matrix actually exists? There is the theory that a human body is like a computer and if that is the case then we would share the same perception of this world through downloading information from some sort of matrix super internet.

“Bollocks”, I hear some of you cry. Well yes, after being used to this world being made of hard physical shit, I do not blame people for saying that. But how can anyone ever know if the world is like that until they have died and see the real truth of the world? How do we know that there is really a matrix if people in the film don’t?

Like the topic of life after death, this is another “I’ll have to see it to believe it” topic. But only after death will we see the world as virtual reality, according to some theorists. This makes sense because if the afterlife isn’t made up of physical space then that explains how it can be home to so many spirits of the dead.  

So back to my question about when space stops and ends. All becomes clear when you realise that space may not exist at all in the measurable way that we think it does. As I have seemed to cover that in the best way that I can, I’ll say how time could be an illusion.

The first thing I must say on time is why the hell is it based on geographical movements of the earth round the sun? Think about it. How can a year be a unit of time when it is based on the earth moving round the sun? That doesn’t measure how fast that time passes does it? Therefore all smaller units aren’t exactly accurate. Like there may be 60 seconds in a minute but who knows how quickly each of those will pass? What I am saying is that time moves faster at some times rather than others simply because we do not measure the passing of events on this earth in a consistent manner. 

Basing the measurement of time on the movement of earth around the sun is preposterous. It’s like basing the measurement of time on me walking around a paddling pool non-stop! I’m bound to travel around it quicker some times than others, aren’t I? Surely scientists would see this logic, surely. Why have they based time on such a stupid thing? Some people would say “they must be hiding something!” but i’m not a total slave to the theorists. There’s no evidence for that, I’m just pointing out that the way we measure time is ridiculous. All of the above explains why time goes faster on some days compared to others. Some would say that it is circumstancial and somebody in a waiting room would obviously think the day was goin slower than somebody at a party. But time isn’t meant to be going faster at different times, it is meant to flow at a constant pace! It even goes at different speeds in the same circumstances! There’s my view on time for you. 

So time and space may not be what they seem. Time is definitely not measured correctly and space may not even exist. Thanks for your time

Now can people actually have outer-body experiences or is it a load of old tosh? There certainly isn’t a good case for it when people like Lisa, a compulsive liar who is a contestant from the UK’s Big Brother 9, claims to regularly leave her body among other dodgy comments such as seeing little green men and being friends with one of the scientists who discovered human DNA!!

Now despite people like Lisa who claim to have ‘done it all’, there are many people who don’t boast about it and seem to be genuinely telling the truth. Now what I feel is the biggest supporter in the arguement of astrology is that many people actually have the same vision of light shining down on them or a tunnel appearing (that’s right … it isn’t a cliche!). It’s like when people say,  religion must exist if so many people follow it. In that case … why don’t people apply the same principle to astrology if so many people have had the experience of leaving their physical body behind them?

Personally, I get abit doubtful when there is a mention of spirit guides and angels though I do believe that our soul does live on after the death of our body on Earth. Some people think “If the afterlife is eternal, wouldn’t the place get crowded with all the people that die?” but the answer would be no because time and space are illusions as I shall explain in a different article so I don’t go off topic.

Whatever the outcome, we shouldn’t fear death. If there is an afterlife, then that is all well and good. If there is absolutely nothing but complete death, then we will not know any better anyway. And as for hell, I don’t think that exists because the universe doesn’t know the difference between right and wrong does it? Plus I think everyone would be forgiven for their crimes and given a chance to start over. So there’s no hell I don’t think. I still wouldn’t recommend going out to kill people or steal, but you shouldn’t feel that you can’t do something just because it is ‘forbidden’ by religion.

Back to astrology anyway. I’m guessing that anybody would like to have an experience like this, especially if it is triggered by an orgasm ! Imagine gliding weightlessly without your body as a burden and having the extra realms of omniscient consciousness unlocked. Doing this would be amazing and I think its a definite ‘I’ll need to see it to believe it’ thing for most people.  

So that’s my view for you. I believe that there is an afterlife though I don’t know what it will contain. And I also believe that people do have outer-body experiences if so many people have reported them but just watch out for the fantasists (sorry Lisa, but you do make me laugh with your stories!)

If they really are exposing the truth about a government ’with no empathy whatsoever’ (as put by Icke), then why the hell hasn’t this terrible government silenced them? Think about it. If you was the government and had people giving away your dark secrets, naturally you’d  want these people dealt with wouldn’t you?

This hasn’t happened. And for years they’ve been leaking secrets quite publicly I must say. Has nobody stopped to think why they have been allowed to do this if the government really is guilty as charged? Wouldn’t they have had ‘accidents’?

Well clearly they are still alive and kicking. Obviously I am not wishing death on them but I am suspicious to how their work has spread globally if what they say about the government is true. I have a few possible suggestions for this.

The first one is that they could just be general nutters or lying about what they are saying. The majority of people would go for this one though one must not judge a book by its cover and read up on these people before criticising them. I believe there is some truth in what these people say although I believe they manipulate the truth, and add a few white lies too, to construct their theories.

The second suggestion is that the government are keeping them alive because it would be suspicious if they had ‘accidents’. By ignoring people like this, the government give the public doubts as to what people are saying about them because the public will think “If [insert name] was telling the truth, then surely the government would want them out of the way. [Insert name] must be lying then, because the government has only responded with ridicule!” Perhaps by making them the nutcase, the government stops the public from taking people like Icke and Jones seriously.

My last suggestion is quite shocking to say the least. I’ll use Icke and Jones as examples here. There is indeed the possibility that they are working FOR the very evil forces they are exposing! You may think this sounds ridiculous but hear me out. How did Alex Jones know all of the details about 9/11 months before when nobody else did? How did he manage to sneak into the heavily guarded Bohemian Grove (where elite people supposedly participate in rituals) and film it? Simple really. He was TOLD about 9/11 and he was LET IN to Bohemian Grove. As for David Icke, I think what he covers is valid however I think he blames everything on the wrong people. David Icke says that the Illuminati is the group behind everything going on in the world although an article came to my attention recently that suggests he could be being paid by the real force behind the events to keep quiet and shift the blame onto someone else. According to the article, the real force controlling world events is the Jesuit Order using the Illuminati as second in command to do its dirty work, thus it would be easy to blame the Illuminati for the actions of  the Jesuit Order. This article also said how authors who have wrote books about the Jesuit Order have had ‘accidents’. Oh dear. See, this is how the government would respond to real threats that it actually doesn’t control.

Why? That’s the question. Why would the Jesuit Order, or whoever is behind everything, want people to reveal their secrets for them? Well in the case of Icke, its to cloak who is really to blame. But I think it could be for control. Again, according to Icke, these people want to control everything in the world so why not control the conspiricies and research about them? Controlling people like Icke and Jones will give people a false sense of security and for people who are becoming aware of the force behind world events, it will completely dupe them and present them with a censored version of what is really going on. It’s that illusion of freedom again isn’t it; like they make democracy look like freedom.

Personally, I am in support of my last suggestion because this explains how Icke and Jones both know so much. How they are both alive despite making valid, dangerous points. How Jones knew about 9/11 months in advance. How Icke can expose the agenda for the world’s future without fear of an ‘accident’. At the end of the day, however, these are just suggestions in response to an interesting question and I guess we will never know the full truth of the matter.

Now is money an illusion? Why would I think such a thing? We use it everyday day. Its a NATURAL part of life, isn’t it?  …………………The simple answer is no. It was invented by the Phoenicians thousands of years ago lol! So it isn’t natural and the question is … wot would life be like without it? And why is the monetary system in place now?

I believe we would be free however the way that society has evolved over the years is that governments don’t want us to be free and that’s why money still exists. Nevertheless, the current society structure would not function without money and you must look at other things that would need to change too.

Over the centuries, our self-sufficiency has gone down the shit pan hasn’t it? Long ago, small villages farmed for themselves and if money was taken away in those days then it really wouldn’t have made much difference because people depended on themselves to farm their own food and the like. Imagine money being taken away nowadays! We all bloody depend on supermarkets! We wudn’t be able to get hold of food and other things without money would we? That’s how society has changed and now has us trapped.

Being made to think that money is part of normal life isn’t the only illusion of money. Right, get hold of a bank note for me. Go on, get one at the ready. Now I can’t speak for dollars or euros but I have noticed something unusual about English bank notes at the very least. Let’s take a £10 note for example. It says that it ‘promises to pay the bearer on demand the sum of Ten Pounds’. Hold on a second … I thought the piece of paper I was holding was the ten pounds???

Apparently not according to this statement. Apparently all bank notes literally are bank notes. The bank’s little way of saying ‘I owe you this money’. Where’s the real wealth then? Thats the question. Not only are we trapped with a monetary system but we aren’t even dealing with real money! If I walked into a bank now and asked for my £10 pointing at that phrase on the note, asking where the real money was, people would think i’d gone mad. But why include that phrase on the bank note if it is real money?

And speaking about not dealing with real money, banks get away with murder. Each bank can lend out ten times the amount it owes. It doesn’t borrow this extra money but is simply permitted to lend it out. So wot does this mean? Well in short, it means that people are being lent money that has never existed. Because banks type the loan electronically into their accounts from the fractional reserve. The money has never exited physically, but people still have to pay it back.

This happens all over the world and the world is actually in debt to itself!! The world has borrowed more money than it has, which is impossible. And when looked at from a world perspective like this, it really becomes apparent that money is an illusion. It simply does not exist. Yet people go bankrupt and lose things they have worked so hard to obtain (like their house or car) because of this non-existant loan they have to pay back.

So that’s my view and knowledge about the monetary system. And those who read David Icke will have a good idea how deep the rabbit hole actually goes because on its own you would wonder why the money system is like it is. But if you know how every element of society interlinks and why it does so in such a way, then all becomes clear.

I hope this has enlightened you. Please stay tuned as I shall release more articles concerning my views and the truth

For too long have I got lost among the endless streams of information, some of which is bullshit to be honest!

But hopefully, we can work out the truth together! I will post articles on things that have came to my attention and are important to highlight. Please feel free to question or oppose me on such issues, or prove me wrong, because after all my main objective is to find out the truth.