The Carbon Con. Is it really a scam?

Two sources have informed me that carbon emissions have NOTHING to do with global warming: David Icke and the Channel 4 documentary called ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle’.

They both say that global warming isn’t caused by our man-made activities and is instead determined by the amount of solar activity occuring on the sun. Naturally, this makes a lot of sense. If there is more solar activity on the sun, then the Earth is bound to warm up. So a correlation between global temperatures and solar activities seems a sensible theory.

And you must think about how the natural carbon emissions, such as from volcanoes and cattle letting off wind, is much higher than our man-made emissions. This very fact shows that even if carbon emissions do contribute to global warming that we aren’t the main contributors, it’s the natural world.

As you can imagine, David Icke uses ‘The Carbon Con’ idea as more ammunition to support his theory that the government covers everything up. It works very well too, I must say. Especially his mention of the ‘medieval warm period’ in which global temperatures soared. He rightly remarked “What caused that? Turbo-charged horsewagons?”. And he is right here… what carbon emissions would we have had in the medieval days? Then he goes on to mention how global temperatures actually dropped during the post-war economic boom when quite frankly, they should have increased if they really were effected by carbon emissions, which took a drastic rise at the time.

David Icke and the documentary practically say the same thing. There’s every possibility that one source inspired the other. Or that another source inspired them. It’s like how Icke talks about how different policies get passed all over the world at similar times because the same people are controlling the governments. What if these two sources where told to present the identical theory by the same people – the Illuminati or Jesuits. It’s generally the Illuminati that does all of the work, and take the blame for it too, because I think that Icke is told to blame everything on them to hide the fact that the Jesuits are in control, which is why he stays alive – for not revealing the Jesuits. People writing about the Jesuits have had a habit of dying…

Back to global warming anyhow. Ofcom and many of the world’s scientists actually opposed the documentary and said that it had fabricated graphs and the like. This is either because the information was absolutely ludicrous or because Ofcom and these senior scientists are in on the whole scam and don’t want the truth getting out. I would think the latter, based on the link between solar activity and global temperatures, and the huge amount of natural carbon emissions. However, I must report that many British newspapers reported that some of the graphs used to support the theory were doctored, thus making it a theory based on an unjustifiable source like the 2012 theories are based on the end of the Mayan Calendar.

Perhaps they were keeping the truth hidden, who knows. Perhaps Icke and the documentary aren’t working with the Illuminati/Jesuits at all, and this is why the Illuminati-controlled media is trying to crush them for their alternative theories. All’s I can say on the matter is that nobody needs a graph to realise that the sun probably is behind global warming … makes sense after all, doesn’t it. And yes, maybe carbon emissions does trap some heat in the atmospere but it doesn’t have too much of an effect. Natural emissions have more of an effect. So I definitely think we are being told a pack of lies and that the carbon con does exist.